Try some restructuring that wasn't the problem?

This commit is contained in:
Chris Hodapp 2020-03-01 22:18:39 -05:00
parent 6a8f0e14c8
commit 120ede4b1b

View File

@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
// TODO: This logic is more or less right, but it
// could perhaps use some un-tupling or something.
let subgeom: Vec<(OpenMesh, &Vec<usize>)> = rs.children.iter().map(|sub| {
let subgeom: Vec<(OpenMesh, Vec<usize>)> = rs.children.iter().map(|sub| {
// Get sub-geometry (still un-transformed):
let (submesh, eval) = sub.rule.to_mesh(arg, iters_left - 1);
// Tally up eval count:
@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
let m2 = submesh.transform(&sub.xf);
(m2, &sub.vmap)
// TODO: Can I avoid the .clone() here?
(m2, sub.vmap.clone())
}).collect();
// Connect geometry from this rule (not child rules):
@ -133,6 +134,8 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
// is, not including any transform of any element of
// 'rules'.
xf: Mat4,
// Child geometry for 'rules', waiting to be connected:
geom: Vec<(OpenMesh, Vec<usize>)>,
}
let mut geom = prim::empty_mesh();
@ -146,6 +149,7 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
rules: eval.children,
next: 0,
xf: nalgebra::geometry::Transform3::identity().to_homogeneous(),
geom: vec![],
};
stack.push(s);
geom = eval.geom;
@ -162,24 +166,18 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
// TODO: This, more elegantly?
count += 1;
if count > max_depth {
break;
}
let n = stack.len(); // TODO: Just keep a running total.
println!("DEBUG: stack has len {}", n);
// We can increment/decrement as we push/pop.
let s = &mut stack[n-1];
if s.next >= s.rules.len() {
if s.next >= s.rules.len() || count > max_depth {
// Connect the geometry we accumulated:
println!("DEBUG: Connecting {} parts", s.geom.len());
geom = geom.connect(&s.geom);
// If we've run out of child rules, backtrack:
stack.pop();
// and have the *parent* node (if one) move on:
if n >= 2 {
stack[n-2].next += 1;
}
// (if there isn't one, it makes no difference,
// because the loop will end)
continue;
}
@ -190,19 +188,22 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
let eval = f(arg);
// Compose child transform to new world transform:
let xf = s.xf * child.xf; // TODO: Check order on this
let xf = child.xf * s.xf; // TODO: Check order on this
let new_geom = eval.geom.transform(&xf);
geom = geom.connect(&vec![(new_geom, &child.vmap)]);
s.next += 1;
s.geom.push((new_geom, child.vmap.clone()));
// TODO: this clone() shouldn't be necessary
// Recurse further (i.e. put more onto stack):
let s2 = State {
rules: eval.children,
next: 0,
xf: xf,
geom: vec![],
};
stack.push(s2);
},
Rule::EmptyRule => {
s.next += 1;
@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ impl<A> Rule<A> {
// TODO: Recursion depth? What does that even mean here?
// Maybe something more like 'branch depth'?
// TODO: Handle final_geom
// TODO: Return right number
return (geom, 0);