Edited pi-pan-tilt part 3 a little; added raspistill note
This commit is contained in:
parent
fecf2f11e4
commit
92b4bb6fc6
@ -33,13 +33,10 @@ I may have mentioned in the first post that I'm using
|
|||||||
[another][arducam_omx219] that uses the 8-megapixel Sony OMX 219, but
|
[another][arducam_omx219] that uses the 8-megapixel Sony OMX 219, but
|
||||||
I haven't gotten my hands on one yet.)
|
I haven't gotten my hands on one yet.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you are expecting the quality of sensors and exposure control that
|
If you are expecting the quality of sensor even an old DSLR camera
|
||||||
even an old entry-level DSLR camera provides, this board will probably
|
provides, this board's tiny, noisy sensor will probably disappoint
|
||||||
disappoint you. The sensor is tiny, it's noisy, and capturing still
|
you. However, if you are accustomed to basically every other camera
|
||||||
images is quite slow (6-7 seconds, in my tests).
|
that is within double the price and interfaces directly with a
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
However, if you are accustomed to basically every other camera that is
|
|
||||||
within 2-3 times the price and is meant to interface directly with a
|
|
||||||
computer of some kind (USB webcams and the like), I think you'll find
|
computer of some kind (USB webcams and the like), I think you'll find
|
||||||
it quite impressive:
|
it quite impressive:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -52,9 +49,9 @@ it quite impressive:
|
|||||||
more detail on optics in a later post.
|
more detail on optics in a later post.
|
||||||
- [raspistill][] will provide 10-bit raw images straight off the
|
- [raspistill][] will provide 10-bit raw images straight off the
|
||||||
sensor (see its `--raw` option). Thus, we can bypass all of the
|
sensor (see its `--raw` option). Thus, we can bypass all of the
|
||||||
automatic brightness, saturation, contrast, and whitebalance which
|
automatic brightness, sharpness, saturation, contrast, and
|
||||||
are great for snapshots and video, but really annoying for composite
|
whitebalance correction which are great for snapshots and video, but
|
||||||
images.
|
really annoying for composite images.
|
||||||
- Likewise via [raspistill][], we may directly set the ISO speed and
|
- Likewise via [raspistill][], we may directly set the ISO speed and
|
||||||
the shutter time in microseconds, bypassing all automatic exposure
|
the shutter time in microseconds, bypassing all automatic exposure
|
||||||
control.
|
control.
|
||||||
@ -71,6 +68,18 @@ to raspistill, and it will produce a JPEG file which contains a
|
|||||||
normal, lossy image, followed by a binary dump of 10-bit raw Bayer
|
normal, lossy image, followed by a binary dump of 10-bit raw Bayer
|
||||||
data from the sensor.
|
data from the sensor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Most of my image captures then are with something like:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
raspistill --raw -t 1 -w 640 -h 480 -ss 1000 -ISO 100 -o filename.jpg
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
That `-t 1` is to remove the standard 5-second timeout; I'm not sure
|
||||||
|
if I can take it lower. `-w 640 -h 480 -q 75` applies to the JPEG
|
||||||
|
image, while the raw data with `--raw` is always full-resolution; I'm
|
||||||
|
saving only a much-reduced JPEG as a thumbnail of the raw data, rather
|
||||||
|
than wasting the disk space and I/O on larger JPEG data than I'll use.
|
||||||
|
`-ss 1000` is for a 1000 microsecond exposure (thus 1 millisecond),
|
||||||
|
and `-ISO 100` is for ISO 100 speed (the lowest this sensor will do).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Converting Raw Images
|
# Converting Raw Images
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
People have already put considerable work into converting these rather
|
People have already put considerable work into converting these rather
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user