hodapp/blag
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Integrated OpenSeadragon viewer into 2016-10-04 page

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Chris Hodapp
2016-10-06 17:28:29 -04:00
parent 1c4e478a41
commit 6abad81ad6
40 changed files with 21364 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
posts/2016-10-04-pi-pan-tilt-2.md
View File

@@ -110,16 +110,27 @@ the same time - which can be particularly necessary for cases like
this where I'm trying to get the most out of cheap optics and when the
Exif tags won't include focal lengths.)
A full-resolution JPEG of the result (after automated stitching,
exposure fusion, lens correction, and so on), is linked below:
A full-resolution JPEG of the result after automated stitching,
exposure fusion, lens correction, and so on, is below in this handy
zoomable viewer using [OpenSeadragon][]:
[![Hive13 full](../assets_external/2016-10-04-pi-pan-tilt-2/hive13-20161004-fused-smaller.jpg){width=100%}](../assets_external/2016-10-04-pi-pan-tilt-2/hive13-20161004-fused.jpg)
<div id="openseadragon1" style="width: 800px; height: 600px;"></div>
<script src="../js/openseadragon/openseadragon.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var viewer = OpenSeadragon({
id: "openseadragon1",
prefixUrl: "../js/openseadragon/images/",
tileSources: "../assets_external/2016-10-04-pi-pan-tilt-2/2016-10-04-hive13.dzi"
});
</script>
It's 91 megapixels. The full TIFF image is 250 MB, so understandably,
I didn't feel like hosting it, particularly when it's not the
prettiest photo or the most technically-perfect one (it's full of lens
flare, chromatic aberration, overexposure, sensor noise, and the
occasional stitching artifact).
It's 91.5 megapixels; if the above viewer doesn't work right, a
[lower-quality JPEG](../assets_external/2016-10-04-pi-pan-tilt-2/2016-10-04-hive13.jpg)
is available too. The full TIFF image is 500 MB, so understandably, I
didn't feel like hosting it, particularly when it's not the prettiest
photo or the most technically-perfect one (it's full of lens flare,
chromatic aberration, overexposure, sensor noise, and the occasional
stitching artifact).
However, you can look up close and see how well the details came
through - which I find quite impressive for cheap optics and a cheap
@@ -146,3 +157,4 @@ images!
[pto_gen]: http://wiki.panotools.org/Pto_gen
[pto_var]: http://wiki.panotools.org/Pto_var
[hugin_lens]: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/calibration/en.shtml
[OpenSeadragon]: https://openseadragon.github.io/