Mass rename/move to get rid of Haskell stuff
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
author: Chris Hodapp
|
||||
comments: true
|
||||
date: 2010-04-03 22:34:54+00:00
|
||||
layout: post
|
||||
slug: hacked-infrared-camera-attempt-1
|
||||
title: 'Hacked infrared camera, attempt #1'
|
||||
wordpress_id: 284
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
- Albums
|
||||
- Project
|
||||
- Technobabble
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- fixphotos
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[This page](http://geektechnique.org/index.php?id=254) at GeekTechnique discusses how most digital cameras are easily turned into infrared cameras by removing the IR blocking filter in front of the CCD, and replacing it with a filter that blocks visible light but passes IR. As luck would have it, exposed film negatives work very well as such a filter.
|
||||
|
||||
So I attempted this on my Kodak EasyShare CX6200, my first camera, which somehow still works after 6 years of abuse. It was surprisingly easy, minus the part where I had to manually resolder the coil which controls the shutter on the lens because it was attached by single hair-thin strands of uninsulated wire. But I digress...
|
||||
|
||||
gallery orderby="ID" (yeah, this is a relic from some Wordpress nonsense)
|
||||
|
||||
I think it's working well. It very clearly passes IR light because the IR pens for the Wii whiteboard showed up quite brightly; it blocks light from LCD monitors and passes sunlight, but red LEDs seem to show up a bit. Trying it on another camera with more manual controls, and perhaps with a sharper filter, might prove interesting.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user